In the world of sustainable investing, the terms ESG and impact investing are often used interchangeably, leading to confusion among investors and industry professionals alike. However, it is important to recognize the distinctions between these two investing approaches to make informed decisions and drive positive change in the financial world.

Paulo Andrade de Oliveira, the founder of Alma Mundus, a global sustainability consultancy, summarizes:

“Consider ESG as a backward-looking framework for identifying risks and opportunities, and view impact investing as a forward-looking strategy to define the types of investments that generate measurable impact alongside financial returns.”
Let’s take a closer look at the variances between ESG and impact investing through a comparative analysis.


The six fundamental differences between ESG and Impact Investing


Impact Investing

1. Purpose ESG serves as a framework for understanding how an organization manages sustainability issues. It is based on past measures and acts as a scorecard. Impact investing is a forward-looking strategy that aims to generate measurable social or environmental impact alongside financial returns. It focuses on intentionality and performance metrics aligned with goals such as the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
2. Fiduciary duty ESG faces fiduciary scrutiny as asset managers must apply discretion in its utilization, potentially conflicting with fiduciary responsibilities. Impact investing does not face the same fiduciary scrutiny as ESG, as investors opt into funds with clear intentions beforehand.
3. Risk vs Opportunity ESG can be used to mitigate risks by screening out non-compliant investments. It may also present opportunities to support progress in specific areas. Impact investing looks towards opportunities by investing in organizations that actively drive social or environmental change. It relies on emerging research to guide decisions.
4. Financial focus ESG primarily focuses on financial returns and can inform future investment decisions based on past data. Impact investing equally weighs financial, social, and environmental impacts, prioritizing intentional benefits and recognizing the interconnection between financial and societal performance.
5. Public vs Private Due to publicly reported data availability, ESG investments are typically associated with public market entities. Impact investments predominantly involve private market entities but are gradually expanding into public markets to drive change on a larger scale.
6. Inclusivity All impact funds incorporate ESG factors, yet not all ESG funds align with impact investing principles. Impact funds integrate ESG findings to support their forward-looking investment strategies. ESG funds may not necessarily incorporate impact considerations, focusing more on retrospective analyses of sustainability measures.
Understanding these differences is crucial for investors seeking to align their financial goals with their values. While ESG provides a framework for assessing sustainability practices, impact investing goes beyond intentionally seeking positive social and environmental outcomes alongside financial returns. By recognizing and leveraging the unique features of each approach, investors can contribute to a more sustainable and impactful financial landscape.
In conclusion, as sustainable investing continues to gain momentum, distinguishing between ESG and impact investing is essential for making informed investment decisions that drive positive change. By embracing the principles of impact investing and integrating ESG considerations into investment strategies, individuals and organizations can play a significant role in advancing the goals of sustainability and responsible finance.
Investing with impact is not just a trend but a necessary step towards creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for all. Let’s utilize the power of finance to drive positive social and environmental change, shaping a better world for generations to come.

Note: This article draws insights and distinctions from Jaclyn Foroughi‘s piece titled “ESG Is Not Impact Investing and Impact Investing Is Not ESG“. By referencing and expanding upon the concepts discussed in Foroughi’s article, we aim to thoroughly analyze the disparities between ESG and impact investing. Leveraging the foundation laid out in Foroughi’s work, we thoroughly examine these two sustainable investing strategies to enhance our readers’ understanding of the topic.

Follow Alma Mundus on LinkedIn and Alma Mundus Channel on YouTube to stay informed about all updates, news, and alerts.

Keep Focused. Keep Learning. 

alma mundus